Regulatory explainer

A biomarker needs a clearly defined job

Proteomics & biomarkersRegulatory science

US Food and Drug Administration · Source date not stated

What the source reports

FDA distinguishes biomarker categories and explains qualification within a stated context of use. A biomarker can be a molecular, tissue, imaging or physiological measurement.

Why it belongs here

Specify what the measurement supports: monitoring, prognosis, treatment response, safety or another defined purpose.

WHAT THIS DOES NOT ESTABLISH

Qualification is context-specific. A measured biological change is not itself evidence that a person feels, functions or survives better.

Before you use it

Read the original source, check its population or model and intended use, and review uncertainty, disclosures and any subsequent updates. This note is a guide to reading, not a substitute for the paper or guidance.

Open the original source

Keep exploring.

Human observational study

What a proteomic aging clock can tell us

A 204-protein clock, developed using 45,441 UK Biobank participants, was associated with future disease and mortality risk and evaluated in Chinese and Finnish cohorts.

Proteomics & biomarkersLongevity
Draft guidance

A validation framework for human-relevant methods

FDA’s March 2026 draft guidance sets out general scientific considerations for validating New Approach Methodologies in drug development and regulatory submissions.

Human models & NAMsRegulatory science
Final guidance

How model-informed evidence should support a decision

ICH M15 addresses planning, evaluation and documentation of model-informed drug-development evidence. FDA’s final guidance is dated June 2026.

AI & computationRegulatory science