Why better tools did not automatically mean better R&D
Scannell and colleagues described a historical decline in new drug approvals per inflation-adjusted R&D dollar, despite improvements in many discovery tools.
US Food and Drug Administration · Dec 21, 2017
FDA explains why surrogate endpoints require careful evaluation: a biomarker may not capture a treatment’s full benefits and risks.
Keep patient-relevant outcomes in view when an early laboratory signal looks encouraging.
Do not describe an exploratory aging clock or assay as a validated surrogate for healthy lifespan without appropriate evidence.
Read the original source, check its population or model and intended use, and review uncertainty, disclosures and any subsequent updates. This note is a guide to reading, not a substitute for the paper or guidance.
Open the original sourceScannell and colleagues described a historical decline in new drug approvals per inflation-adjusted R&D dollar, despite improvements in many discovery tools.
A 204-protein clock, developed using 45,441 UK Biobank participants, was associated with future disease and mortality risk and evaluated in Chinese and Finnish cohorts.
ICH M15 addresses planning, evaluation and documentation of model-informed drug-development evidence. FDA’s final guidance is dated June 2026.