Why better tools did not automatically mean better R&D
Scannell and colleagues described a historical decline in new drug approvals per inflation-adjusted R&D dollar, despite improvements in many discovery tools.
Research, regulatory references and practical methods, with an explanation of what each source can and cannot establish.
Scannell and colleagues described a historical decline in new drug approvals per inflation-adjusted R&D dollar, despite improvements in many discovery tools.
A 204-protein clock, developed using 45,441 UK Biobank participants, was associated with future disease and mortality risk and evaluated in Chinese and Finnish cohorts.
FDA’s March 2026 draft guidance sets out general scientific considerations for validating New Approach Methodologies in drug development and regulatory submissions.
ICH M15 addresses planning, evaluation and documentation of model-informed drug-development evidence. FDA’s final guidance is dated June 2026.
FDA distinguishes biomarker categories and explains qualification within a stated context of use. A biomarker can be a molecular, tissue, imaging or physiological measurement.
FDA explains why surrogate endpoints require careful evaluation: a biomarker may not capture a treatment’s full benefits and risks.
Ewart and colleagues evaluated a human Liver-Chip for predictive toxicology using a defined set of compounds and an accompanying economic analysis.
OECD Test Guideline 439 describes reconstructed human epidermis methods for identifying skin irritation hazards in a defined testing context.
FDA’s January 2025 draft describes a risk-based approach to evaluating AI models used to support regulatory decisions about drugs and biological products.
NCATS describes tissue chips built with human cells to model aspects of organ structure and function and investigate potential drug effects.
FDA’s M15 resource center links the guidance, an overview, evidence-assessment templates and worked examples.